tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21310057.post4633803193097585816..comments2020-09-25T05:32:29.674-07:00Comments on Journal of Boardgame Design: Essen 2008 Unwrapped: Part 3 - CavumJonathan Degannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09377251737931816828noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21310057.post-40595322316774569352012-07-17T10:28:18.010-07:002012-07-17T10:28:18.010-07:00What's Taking place i'm new to this, I stu...What's Taking place i'm new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I'm hoping to contribute & help other users like its helped me. Good job.<br /><i>My weblog</i> ; <b><a href="http://bdwebsearch.com/" rel="nofollow">local searh engine</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21310057.post-87854254843310228922008-12-13T16:39:00.000-08:002008-12-13T16:39:00.000-08:00Good analysis, as usual. Given your apparent reac...Good analysis, as usual. Given your apparent reaction to playing the game at the time, it seems as though your estimation of its worth increased as you began to think through the details of your analysis.<BR/><BR/>It struck both of us at the end of the game that it might even make more sense to ignore the cards entirely and just sell in the market, since the prices there were typically higher than the cards and did not require you to get particular gems (although this did not appear to be a problem as the game progressed and it was easier to get lots of gems than it seemed as we were learning the game). OTOH, maybe if too many people took the market, the price would be sufficiently depressed such that the cards would be more valuable. Perhaps the best strategy is to be a contrarian--do whatever no one else, or at least the fewest number of players is doing. <BR/><BR/>RichRichard Abramshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12958133914443522520noreply@blogger.com